Subscribe to our RSS Follow us on twitter Visit our facebook page Subscribe on youtube

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Review

amazing-spider-man

Reviewed by Phil Boothman.

The first Amazing Spider-Man film was a divisive entry into superhero movie canon: some people enjoyed it despite its flaws, while what seems like a majority of others considered it to be too soon for a reboot of the franchise and generally took against the film. Much of what you take away from the sequel will depend on your reaction to the first film, as it continues in the same vein and picks up on some of the dangling plot threads and themes from the first instalment.

For full disclosure, I thoroughly enjoyed The Amazing Spider-Man, and actually thought it was a more faithful depiction of the character than the original Sam Raimi film: it was by no means a perfect superhero movie, but I still don’t understand the vitriol with which it is attacked by its detractors.

So with that in mind, how does The Amazing Spider-Man 2 hold up?

In my opinion, quite admirably: the threat is amped up, it is much richer thematically, and Andrew Garfield portrays our favourite wall-crawler at the top of his game, having more fun in the first ten minutes than Tobey Maguire seemed to have in the entirety of the original trilogy.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2: Electro Sneak PeekThe plot of the film consists of a number of different strands: firstly, the emergence of Jamie Foxx’s Electro after an unfortunate accident in Oscorp’s electric eel storage area (I’m not entirely sure what the eels were doing there, although I may have lost concentration for a moment when they explained this). Electro makes for a much greater threat than the Lizard did in the first film, displaying power that Spider-Man is only able to overcome by getting lucky, and his motivation as a lonely, insignificant guy suddenly given power and attention is much more interesting than the average supervillain: it makes Spider-Man as much a victim of his own hubris as of a nasty coincidence with some electric eels.

Secondly, there’s the return of Peter Parker’s old friend Harry Osborn, shipped off to boarding school by his father Norman at a young age and now back to visit his dying father. After some distressing news, his mission becomes one centred on self-preservation at all costs regardless of who that forces him to come into conflict with. Dane DeHaan injects some pathos into Osborn’s journey, but without the advantage of appearing in the first film his struggle can come off as somewhat shallow and devolves into standard crazy-villain fare a little too quickly.

amazing-spider-man-2-poster-2013Regardless of the problems with Osborn’s character, reservations about there being ‘too many villains’ in the film, inevitably drawing comparisons with the issue-ridden Spider-Man 3, are largely unfounded. While one villain of the two major ones featured is somewhat short-changed, and doesn’t get a particularly satisfying resolution to their arc, the film doesn’t feel over-stuffed with threats and, while there is a lot going on, it doesn’t feel cluttered. Besides, Paul Giamatti’s Aleksei ‘Rhino’ Systevich, a third villain featured heavily in the film’s promotional material, gets roughly four minutes of screentime and has no real bearing on the plot of the movie as a whole.

The third major plot strand concerns Peter’s search for more information about his parents, and this is probably the area which is the most problematic, and was the most problematic part of the first film for me as well: in a blockbuster market over-stuffed with characters who are ‘destined’ to be heroes, taking away the more incidental part of Spider-Man’s origin story, that he just happened to be bitten by a radioactive spider, takes away some of the uniqueness of the character. In this version, the spider which bit Peter was modified by his father while he was working for Oscorp, and makes his origin more pre-determined than it ever was in the comics. However, some of these concerns, carried over from the first film, are allayed through Peter’s discoveries and mixes the pre-destined with the random in a moderately satisfying way.

Finally, the most satisfying and affecting plot strand revolves around Peter’s on-off relationship with Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy: possibly due to their off-screen romance, Garfield and Stone have fantastic chemistry throughout, and inject their on-screen relationship with all the complicated emotions that come with a pairing literally shadowed by the ghost of Gwen’s father. More importantly, while it is an important part of her character, Gwen is by no means defined by her relationship with Peter, having a life and ambitions of her own. This gives her considerably more agency than the average superheroic love interest, and makes the relationship feel a lot more real: a reality which makes certain events in the film far more emotionally affecting, and to comic book fans, heart-breakingly inevitable.

Verdict: 7/10

Overall the film, while not perfect and not quite as great as it could have been, is a lot of fun throughout, and feels much emotionally weightier than the first film: whereas The Amazing Spider-Man was concerned with scientific hubris and the dangers of one person considering themselves superior to everyone else, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is all about the legacies passed down from fathers to children, and feels more satisfying for the more sophisticated theme. However, it never feels bogged down in a ‘message’, and flies as freely through the 142-minute runtime as Spidey does through the streets of Manhattan.

Related posts:

  • The Administrator

    I loved this film. 10/10

  • Joel Mole

    I’m glad to see a positive review of the film. Earlier today I saw a review that was 100% negative and he even said it was worse than Batman and Robin. So it was refreshing to see this positive review

  • TardisBoy

    I read this expecting a spoiler free review as it was stated…only to be spoiled about two major things (one wasn’t outrightly spoiled, but strongly hinted at by the author who made it really obvious as to what it was). Quite annoyed about that. But still, great review – but it would have been nice to have discovered these things watching the film for myself.

    • PK-S

      If you’re referring to the bit I think you are (the penultimate paragraph?) then I see your point. I can infer a lot from it and I think it’s really spoiled a bit of the movie..

    • EmpathDigital

      Hi there – I’m Phil and I wrote this article. I’m sorry that you feel that this review spoiled anything major about the movie: I spent a lot of time writing and re-writing the part that you seem to be referring to, and as much as I did end up implying the outcome of a certain event I felt it was important to talk in some way about what was, for me, the most emotionally affecting part of the movie. Perhaps I should have done this more subtly, but I ran the text past several people who had not seen the film before submitting and they saw no issues with what I had written so I didn’t see any need to change it.

      As for the second major thing I supposedly spoiled, I can’t work out what it is: if it’s anything to do with Peter’s discoveries about his father’s work, I did not mention anything that wasn’t covered in the first film; if it was about Rhino getting minimal screen time that was something which has been widely covered in pre-release interviews and promotional material; if it’s something else that I’m missing, please do enlighten me as I’m sure it was not intentional.

      I did also voice my concerns about the nature of the review to the editor of the site, who as you can see has now removed the phrase ‘spoiler-free’ from the title of the article, but I am sorry that you feel my review spoiled your enjoyment of the film: I’m a film fan myself and it is never my intention when writing these reviews to ruin the experience for anyone else.

      • PK-S

        Hi Phil,

        While I may not be TardisBoy (I’m sure he’ll see this and give his own response), I must say that even though you don’t say anything explicit – Lord knows what would have happened if you did – if anyone has heard even a mere whisper of said spoiler in the past few months or, more critically, been a comic-book aficionado (obviously, they would know about this spoiler but not necessarily which movie it would occur in) then it’s pretty much spoiled.

        Obviously, you didn’t mean to, it’s just one of those innocent mistakes that happen occasionally. I won’t hold a grudge and I’m just glad you enjoyed the movie because everyone else has been a bit pessimistic.

        Great review, too!

        • ShalkaDoctor

          He didn’t spoil it, so get off your soapbox and stop giving him a hard time. It’s purely down to your interpretation of the review.

          You’d only interpret it as a spoiler if you had:

          a) already seen the movie and knew what was happening and what he was hinting at
          b) knew the comics
          c) or read and article that speculated or outright spoiled it based on the comics

          • Basically Just a Snow Queen

            I just saw the ending (even though I live in America. Thanks Primewire. :P)

            I already knew it, because of the old comics, and a certain persons’ clothes, but I was hoping it wasn’t so.

            And the third one definitely applies. Need to actually read the comic. :P

            DEM FEELS. :( :P

  • Calebxy

    I really really liked this film. It’s definitely one of my favourites. However, I thought it was a bit slow around the middle, whereas the first film was thoroughly perfect in every way. So the first one is still my favourite, but this comes in at a close second.

    Also, that Goblin fight scene towards the end was so incredibly awesome and intense! And the music was equally so, even on its own.

Follow

rss twitter youtube facebook