Subscribe to our RSS Follow us on twitter Visit our facebook page Subscribe on youtube

Doctor Who: 707 “The Rings of Akhaten” Review

rings-poster-series-7

Reviewed by Adam James Cuthbert

 “I walked away from the Last Great Time War. I marked the passing of the Time Lords. I saw the birth of the universe and I watched as time ran out, moment by moment, until nothing remained. No time. No space. Just me! I’ve walked in universes where the laws of physics were devised by the mind of a madman. I’ve watched universes freeze and creations burn. I’ve seen things you wouldn’t believe. I’ve lost things you will never understand. And I know things. Secrets that must never be told. Knowledge that must never be spoken. Knowledge that will make parasite gods blaze!”– The Doctor

The Rings of Akhaten is a magnificent story. Grandiose and operatic in the scope and magnitude of its scintillating ambition and drive, but equally intimate and down-to-earth in its exploration of its central characters’ thoughts, feelings, and histories, The Rings of Akhaten is a triumph for neophyte Who writer Neil Cross (of Luther fame). Like the high-concept The Impossible Planet before it (which saw the Doctor clash with the Devil himself) so too does The Rings of Akhaten depict the Doctor’s confrontation with an adversary on a Godlike scale; a “parasite god” with delusions of grandeur that has held the Seven Worlds in its oppressive thrall for millions of years. Such an adversary – a celestial behemoth resembling a burning orange-red planet – serves as testament to the story’s grand sense of scale.

What I admire most about the story is how Cross imbues his world with a powerful sense of culture. We experience the literature (the ‘creation/origin tale’), arts, traditions, communality of the marketplace (Clara even samples the ‘local cuisine’), and currency of this vibrant, majestic world. The marketplace, for example, is a bustling ‘hive’ of activity; an impressive feat of production, populated with a diversity of alien species. (It’s a nice touch for the Doctor to have alien interrelationships as well, branching out the Doctor’s world.) It’s a shame that most of the expressive designs flit by so quickly, there isn’t time to fully appreciate them individually. However, it does help to situate the viewer with the focaliser, Clara’s point-of-view. We experience this world through glimpses, or fragments, as Clara herself does. (It’s not unreasonable to suggest this is an allegory for our own lives. Life, after all, is disclosed in fragments, or partialities, and we never experience the complete picture at once. There’s always another layer of meaning to be uncovered; as Clara herself learns within the story.)

The songs themselves make for a striking contrast, whilst enhancing the story’s lyrical atmosphere, ingraining us within this distinct sense of culture. The first – a haunting melody in reverence of the Old God, associated with rest and slumber – signifies the people’s dedication to tradition (“generation after generation” instructing one another in the lyrics, so as to continue ‘The Long Song’), but also their trepidation and oppression; while the second – a heart-warming, triumphant leitmotif – is associated with awakening and rebirth. This illuminates the narrative’s climatic reversal of circumstances: the people emerging from the shadows of their past, into the light of a new age.

Emilia Jones (daughter of singer Aled Jones) delivers a superlative performance for her young age. Not only is her singing radiant and beautiful, but she develops a poignant chemistry with Jenna-Louise Coleman, as Merry Gejelh, “the Queen of Years”, and Clara bond. I’m overjoyed that Cross has Clara address Merry on her own level, respecting the child’s intelligence.

Indeed, one of the story’s strengths lies in its elements of realism, as Clara – her personality, identity, and history – is sufficiently fleshed out, so as to emotionally invest us within the character, and convince us of her independent worth. In the scene where Clara and Merry converse around the back of the TARDIS, Clara acquires Merry’s trust and boosts her confidence by relating her own experience of being afraid: “Blackpool beach, bank holiday Monday. About ten billion people”. I love the nuance of Cross addressing this is how the world would be interpreted through a child’s eyes: incidents are amplified, grossly out of proportion, by a child’s sense of consternation and uncertainty about their place in the world, as they are still learning and discovering for themselves. Coleman flourishes at portraying this side to Clara. I would arguably prefer Clara’s arc to revolve around this portrayal: the story of a young woman who derives inner strength from the memory of her beloved mother; whose untimely death left her crestfallen, yet reaffirmed her confidence in the challenges of life. It’s simple yet transcendental.

Although there are echoes of Amy Pond within Clara’s character (both have an attachment to their childhood, and are psychologically identified with a salient childhood possession retained into their adulthood; in Clara’s case the book 101 Places to See, which she inherited from her mother), Cross effectively secures Clara (at least within The Rings of Akhaten) as an independent, well-rounded character within her own right. Not only does she nobly exchange her mother’s ring for the moped, recognising Merry’s life is paramount (as the Doctor later champions the sacredness of individual life), but she dauntlessly faces the gluttonous Old God, offering it “the most important leaf in human history”. The ordinary person is fascinating, Cross stresses. Their personal chronicle rivals the significance of elaborate mythologies, or mysteries, because the former, crucially, is what we, the audience, identify with. In this case, Clara’s triumph is a mirror for our own capacity to achieve our potential.

The Rings of Akhaten is ultimately a story about very human types of experience and self-discovery. Ironically, Cross creates a world that at its core is not too alien from our own. By introducing the principle of psychometry (“objects psychically imprinted with their history”), Cross lays the foundation for the story’s examination of the power of memory. This is evoked through the technique of analepsis/flashback, as Clara reminisces about her mother (“I will always find you”). Furthermore, Cross observes how, every day, we form lasting cognitive connections with the objects that occupy our world; that we instinctually attribute meaning to objects, in the process of shaping our lives. This can be seen in the opening sequence when Dave Oswald has attached a meaning to the leaf that resulted in his meeting, and falling in love, with Ellie Ravenwood.

The Rings of Akhaten is not without its flaws. The Mummy and the Vigil, particularly, were rather peripheral, despite boasting potentially sinister designs. It’s also unfortunate we had two consecutive stories that utilised a type of bike, as well as the plot-twist of the true antagonist lurking behind a proxy. The sonic screwdriver was overused – there’s a moment that borders on silliness. While I appreciate the ambiguity within the Doctor’s speech (does he refer to Omega (The Three Doctors), or the Celestial Toymaker perhaps?), the allusion to Susan, on the other hand, felt like an extraneous inclusion, as Clara’s bewilderment is never followed up.

Theory

For fun, I speculate the anomaly of Clara is that she’s destined to be reincarnated throughout human history, with the same soul being reconstituted in a new, physically identical body from the last (explaining how she has parents and a childhood), across discrete epochs (e.g. Victorian Britain, then say a passenger on the Titanic, another in WWII Britain), with no recollection of her past selves. The tragedy of her iterations is that they all die young. Of course, this presupposes the premature death of modern-day Clara.

Verdict: 9/10

In conclusion, The Rings of Akhaten was a satisfying, engrossing, multi-layered story. With a combination of memorable dialogue, stellar acting from the two lead actresses, and intelligent analysis of the power and nature of memory, community, and individuality, to surmount the obstacles of life, Cross places himself in good stead for any future contributions.

Related posts:

  • AmyPondIsAwesome

    Even though I strongly disagree, this is your best review yet. You’re much better at writing positive than negative.

  • https://youtube.googleapis.com/v/a1pzCjPN9xs TheHordeofTravesties™

    Great Review!

    I really enjoyed this episode. The speech was really powerful but ‘Take it all baby’ part slightly ruined it. Clara had a much better role in this, then last weeks episode. I liked how human the reason why Mary was hiding. The male song was awful.
    I want Clara to become a full time companion rather than her going home every time.
    Overall my rating would be a 7 or 8/10.

  • https://twitter.com/#!/Jawsey The Weeping Jawsey

    Adam your greatest writing strength is almost certainly when dealing with the more thematic side of Who, and I’m so pleased you rose to that so well in this review here. I did feel your previous review of The Bells did get overly caught up in the trivial issues of the episode, and a little too much emphasis on the overall half-series arc at such an early stage of the season. But here, when you’re dealing with what scenes, plot points and moments in the epsiode meet more spiritually than literally you really come into your own, and it is a delight to see the flow of your highly articulate thoughts come together. Good work indeed, you have yourself a fully satisfied reader, who enjoyed the episode as much as you did and is very pleased to see such a well constructed viewpoint

    • http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/series-7-part-1-in-perspective-42184.htm TheStranger

      Thank you very much; that means a lot. I’m admittedly displeased with The Bells of Saint John review, but Steven Moffat doesn’t give me much to work with these days; thankfully, Neil Cross provided a refreshing and exciting episode. Again, thank you.

  • Harry Jewell

    What a fantastic review. You put in some great points that i hadn’t previously thought about. Well Done.
    I wonder what Neil Cross’s next episode, Hide will be like?

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsm1kIbKIfo EternalDoctor

    You have really outdone yourself with this stupendous review, which is as intelligent as it is enjoyable. The way you interpret this episode is remarkable; you have the ability to go deeper into the episodes layers and that adds something very unique to your reviews. Your vocabulary seems to know no bounds either. It’s astounding! There is nothing I can disagree with (apart from your theory because, as most people, I have my own theory worked out) and I’m pleased to see you enjoyed this supreme episode. Your rating for it is actually higher than mine, but that’s because I felt that the Vigil were extremely underdeveloped and that it dragged at certain places.

    I do hope the upcoming episodes continue to impress you because, as others have pointed out, your best reviews are inevitably the ones where you’re enthusiastic about the episode. This was a superb review and it made for a pleasurable read!

  • The Watchful Guardian

    Well done Adam. A nice read.

  • Peripherus

    Completely agree.

  • TardisBoy

    This is by far the best review you have done Adam. I agree with every single world. I loved this episode just as much as you did, and it was a brilliant start for Cross IMO. Your writing continues to astound and awe me. Well done my friend. This is a brilliant review.

  • http://thetardismatrix.weebly.com/ Essssssterath

    Fantastic review as always! I always enjoy reading your reviews, but your I love reading the reviews where you’re positive about the episode- makes it even more interesting to read! Keep up the great work!! :)

  • Stargazer0118

    Great review. I too truly enjoyed this episode despite its faults. I just found myself really entertained and engaged in the story, and that’s what really matters to me. It was a more emotional and personal story and it worked well because I got more appreciation of both Clara and Matt Smith as the Doctor. Adam, Did you like Smith’s performance in this ep? Did you like how he delivered his speeches? I liked what he did, a lot. This is the first time he felt like he was a great Doctor to me. He finally impressed me. I think I’m gonna be sad when he ends his run as the Doctor. Never expected that. Sigh.

  • http://twitter.com/ZakkVanBurace Zakk Williams

    Ahh, I love your reviews, your writing skills… you seem like a very intelligent person. I’m very pleased with ‘The Rings of Akhaten’ too, it’s a blow of fresh air after three consecutive Moffat episodes.

  • lozpot

    I’m bewildered how this episode got 9/10.

    • lozpot

      Shouldn’t 9/10 be reserved for classics – Human Nature, Blink, Left Turn…? I personally didn’t like the episode, but even if I was being generous I couldn’t see it getting more than 6/10.

      • The Salmon Bagel of Rassilon

        All of those deserve 10/10.

  • twoheartsonemind

    Great article. Agree completely.

Follow

rss twitter youtube facebook